Prediction of Mike De Palmer vs Tsuyoshi Fukui Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. De Palmer vs T. Fukui

Mike De Palmer

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

177

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Tsuyoshi Fukui

JPN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

177

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Palmer 1 - 0 Fukui

They have played 2 sets in total, with Mike De Palmer winning 2 and Tsuyoshi Fukui winning 0. The last match between Mike De Palmer and Tsuyoshi Fukui was at the Tokyo Outdoor, 17-10-1983, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Mike De Palmer getting the victory 7-5 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Palmer	1
Fukui	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Tokyo Outdoor(10-17-83)

Stats

Mike De Palmer

Tsuyoshi Fukui

M. D. Palmer vs T. Fukui H2H Profile

M. D. Palmer	Stats	T. Fukui
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
46.55% (81-93)	Career Total W/L	53.38% (71-62)
1	Hard	0
0	Titles	2
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. D. Palmer vs T. Fukui Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mike De Palmer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tsuyoshi Fukui has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mike De Palmer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tsuyoshi Fukui has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mike De Palmer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tsuyoshi Fukui has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mike De Palmer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tsuyoshi Fukui winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mike De Palmer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 13/15), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 15/19). Tsuyoshi Fukui has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 46% (W/L 3/1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Mike De Palmer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tsuyoshi Fukui has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mike De Palmer winning 1 times and Tsuyoshi Fukui being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mike De Palmer winning 2 and Tsuyoshi Fukui winning 0.
The last match between Mike De Palmer and Tsuyoshi Fukui was at the Tokyo Outdoor, 17-10-1983, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Mike De Palmer getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mike De Palmer has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tsuyoshi Fukui has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mike De Palmer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tsuyoshi Fukui has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mike De Palmer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tsuyoshi Fukui has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mike De Palmer vs Tsuyoshi Fukui Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. D. Palmer vs T. Fukui H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. D. Palmer	Stats	T. Fukui
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	7
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. D. Palmer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Johannesburg CH - 01-05-1989
R4 Peter PalandjianP. Palandjian	L	6-2 7-6	Stats
R3 Stefan Van SchalkwykS. Van	W	2-6 6-2 6-2	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 12-09-1988
R3 Gary DonnellyG. Donnelly	W	6-3 7-6	Stats
R4 Scott DavisS. Davis	L	5-7 6-4 7-6	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 18-07-1988
R3 David NainkinD. Nainkin	L	0-6 7-5 6-2	Stats

View All

T. Fukui Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Nagoya CH - 26-04-1989
R3 Dong Wook SongD. Wook	L	6-3 7-6	Stats
Tokyo Outdoor - 17-04-1989
R2 Jim GrabbJ. Grabb	L	7-5 4-6 6-0	Stats
Nagoya CH - 27-04-1988
R3 Kenzo UkonK. Ukon	W	6-0 4-6 6-4	Stats
R4 John LettsJ. Letts	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Tokyo Outdoor - 11-04-1988
R3 Scott DavisS. Davis	L	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

M. D. Palmer vs T. Fukui Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. D. Palmer	Stats	T. Fukui
46.55% (81/93)	YTD Win/Loss	53.38% (71/62)
47.79% (227/248)	Sets Win/Loss	53.24% (181/159)
48.69% (2283/2406)	Games Win/Loss	52.06% (1628/1499)
45.24% (38/46)	Hard Win/Loss	65.63% (42/22)
46.43% (13/15)	Clay Win/Loss	47.37% (18/20)
53.57% (15/13)	Indoor Hard W/L	30.77% (8/18)
44.12% (15/19)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
488.78	Average Opponent Rank	609.76
40.00% (12/18)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
33.33% (4/8)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	69.23% (27/12)
50.42% (60/59)	Main Tour W/L	27.78% (10/26)
38.46% (5/8)	Challenger W/L	58.62% (34/24)
48% (67/140)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	50% (51/101)
41% (14/34)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	61% (19/31)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/1)
49% (33/68)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (16/32)
73% (84/61)	1st Set Won, Won Match	91% (65/59)
27% (84/23)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	9% (65/6)
22% (90/20)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (68/11)